The second part of the article is a report given by a man aboard the Platte Valley, a steamer that was allowed during seize fire to come and recover wounded men from the fort as well as burry dead. This report was done 3 days after the battle and was wired from St. Louis. According to the soldier on the boat, the hospital at the battle site was invaded and wounded who lay in the hospital were shot, or forced to exit the hospital before the hospital was burned. Also mentioned in the article was that General Chambers, one of the leaders of the Rebel forces, stated that they have tried to prevent the carnage that happened at Fort Pillow despite the Confederacy having the policy of not sparing negro soldiers.
Obviously the accounts told in this story are gruesome and implicate war crimes enacted by Confederate forces. However, due to the information being one sided I know I would get an entirely different report if I were to look at a Southern newspaper. I think that it would be fun to take my project in the direction of looking at the reactions in the media towards the Battle since it was a very contentious topic at the time in the media.
http://www.nytimes.com/1864/04/16/news/black-flag-horrible-massacre-rebels-fort-pillow-captured-after-desperate-fight.html
It sounds like this article is a very interesting, and compelling, aspect that can be added to your paper. I also like your idea of looking at the reactions of the media during this time period. It would give your paper depth and a social aspect, which can make a great paper even better! It would be interesting to read, if there is such a thing, the account of General Chambers, to get his perspective of the massacre.
ReplyDelete