This
week for my blog post I received one of my sources through MOBIUS, it is a
primary source written by Sylvia Pankhurst. It is her memoir of the women’s
movement her mother and sister led. The name of the source is The Suffragette Movement an Intimate Account
of the Persons and Ideals. This source is especially important to my work
on my thesis because it not only offers specific accounts of what happened to
these women, but it also offers information from Sylvia’s perspective on the
more militant actions of her sister Christabel. Another helpful aspect of this
source is how Sylvia quotes newspaper articles from the period as well,
directly, thereby giving a fuller picture of the different protests and events
going on. The source itself is divided into nine books within the larger text,
within each book there are about five to seven chapters devoted to the topic.
Some of the chapters I have begun to analyze include those written on their
militant tactics, forced feedings, the flight of Christabel Pankhurst, and
arson.
Sylvia’s
chapter on the militant tactics of the Suffragettes begins rather early in her
memoir, before the fracturing of the WSPU [Women’s Social and Political Union].
Christabel and Sylvia had a fractured relationship later during the movement
due to Christabel’s desire for more militant tactics. Her desire came in
response to the lack of accomplishments done by the mere protests and rallies. Christabel
first responded more actively during a meeting where Annie Kenney asked when
women would receive the vote. The men moved to remove Annie from the meeting,
so Christabel stood and attempted to defend Annie. She told the officials, “I
shall assault you! I shall spit at you,” (Pankhurst 189). Christabel responded
exactly how she said she would, by spitting in the face of the police
superintendent and hitting others. Sylvia also refers to Annie Kenney regularly
in her writings. Annie Kenney became the first working class woman to join the
WSPU and fell into an easy friendship with Christabel. The other important
aspect about these militant women that one must remember is the pain they
endured, especially during their imprisonments and forced feedings.
The forced feedings of women imprisoned during the movement
represent a much darker side of this time. Yes, women acted more violently and
destroyed buildings and mail, but they never intentionally harmed people. Yet
when they were imprisoned instead of letting them die as martyrs for their
cause via a hunger strike the government forced the wardens and nurses to feed
these women. Eventually doctors came out to stand against such traumatic
experiences stating how much damage this actually caused to the women
physically to endure. Sylvia quotes Dr. Forbes Winslow on the results of forced
feeding, “seriously to injure the constitution, to lacerate the parts
surrounding the mouth, to break and ruin the teeth…to cause dangerous chronic
symptoms,” (Pankhurst 317). As evidence from this one quote and the rest of the
chapter, I will certainly be exploring the impact of forced feedings on the
militancy of the movement. I hope that I will receive other sources from inter-library
loan soon. I also plan to begin looking at JSTOR and other databases for
newspaper articles and journals discussing these topics.
Here is the Chicago citation for the source:
Pankhurst,
Sylvia. The Suffragette Movement an
Intimate Account of Persons and Ideals. London: Virago Limited, 1977.
Jenn, I'm not going to pretend to know ANYTHING about the movement you're writing your paper over, but I do find your latter point highly interesting. Perhaps there's more to be found there! Forced feeding certainly doesn't seem like it would be a very effective way to remove the suffragettes as an enemy group, so it might be fascinating to delve a little bit more into the effects and reactions to this. Were there other instances of the government stepping in to keep these women from dying martyrs? Does this perhaps have anything to do with their gender, and the stir that would be caused by so many women dying in the government's custody? Keep up the good work!
ReplyDelete