In my previous posts I have focused on the composition of
power in terms of punishment and torture. This was to show that these expressions
of power could be understood historically, in that the when the locus of power
was singular, these overtly brutal shows of power were necessary. For
discussion on this, please read my post “The Function of Power: The Sovereign
in the 'Classical Age'”. As alluded to in my last post, in the 18th century
an emphasis on efficiency was beginning to appear. Where executions were once
extremely messy and public affairs, they were beginning to be more private and
less tortuous.
This change symbolized a different
way in which power would manifest itself. Instead of exerting itself as overt
spectacles as punishment in the classical age did, discipline would exert power
in enumerable small pushes. While public punishments would exert all of the sovereign’s
power at once, streamlined and organized institutions would structure time and
space in order to control and reform individuals. But how can an institution do
this? The answer to this is found in an institution that is quite old, the monastery.
In this setting individuals where separated and partitioned for much of their
time into cells, not only this but the time of these individuals were
regulated. Beginning in the 18th century, Foucault finds that these
two ways in which the monastic setting has been structured for a long time is
applied, with greater severity and sophistication, in other institutions like
colleges and hospitals.
However, the poster child for the
application of disciplinary measures and the results of these measures can be
found in the military. The construction of the soldier from the peasant is done
through many acts of discipline; broadly speaking, this is done in terms of
changing how an individual thinks (and behaves) in terms of time and space. I
do not mean the highly abstract notions of time and space, but the spacial
relationship between one person and another (e.g. living in the barracks and
sleeping in evenly spaced single beds every night) and how one thinks about how
they spend their ‘time’. By regulating the activities of a person down to the
quarter of the hour or the minute, you will change how that person think about
time, what I mean by this can be found in any schedule for persons going
through basic training. The many pressures that go into changing how a person
is and behaves are disciplines.
This is relevant to my study
because these disciplines exist in every institution, including the University.
Understanding how the student is disciplined and formed will help me understand
how power is manifested in this institution today.
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Random House, 1997.
Hey Logan, discipline in terms of time management is something I thought of while training, discipline in terms of space is interesting. I can definitely see how having your personal space invaded at any time as a display of power. If you need a primary source.. Just kidding.
ReplyDeleteIntriguing topic Sir Whittmore. One thing I'm having trouble understanding though, is which entity in each of these cases actually holds the power over the individual. When I think of power, in a prison for instance, it seems as though it lies within the implicit means of control. In a prison setting, this could be a number of things. For one, it could be the desire to reduce a sentencing. It could also be maximizing the length or quality of life by flying under the radar. In each case though, it seems the motivating factor is what the institution stands for, as opposed to the institution itself.
ReplyDeleteI think your focus might be around how power is categorized and distributed in education--and how social control emanates from its structure?
ReplyDelete